• Users Online: 555
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ERRATUM
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 235

Erratum: Comparing outcomes of the endoscopic and open external oblique myofascial release


Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2021

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2589-8736.334555

Get Permissions


How to cite this article:
. Erratum: Comparing outcomes of the endoscopic and open external oblique myofascial release. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg 2021;4:235

How to cite this URL:
. Erratum: Comparing outcomes of the endoscopic and open external oblique myofascial release. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 20];4:235. Available from: http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/text.asp?2021/4/4/235/334555



In the article titled “Comparing outcomes of the endoscopic and open external oblique myofascial release”, published on pages 63–66, Issue 2, Volume 3 in International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery,[1] the section, “Declaration of Ethical Approval” having the following information went missing due to technical errors:

This study was approved by New Hanover Regional Medical Center (No. 1708-3) on 3 August, 2017.



 
  References Top

1.
Appleby PW, Bilezikian JA, Faulkner JD, Fox SS, Hope WW. Comparing outcomes of the endoscopic and open external oblique myofascial release. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg 2020;3:63-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed52    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded2    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal