• Users Online: 66
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 188-194

Clinical outcomes vary for emergent and elective ventral hernia repair


1 University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Bowling Green, USA
2 Department of Surgery, Division of General, Endocrine & Metabolic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
3 University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, USA
4 Department of Surgery, Division of Healthcare Outcomes and Optimal Patient Services, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
5 Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma & Acute Care, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA

Correspondence Address:
Dr. John Scott Roth
Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Division Chief General, Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, 800 Rose Street, C 240, Lexington, KY 40536.
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_36_21

Rights and Permissions

PURPOSE: Elective ventral hernia repair (ELVHR) is generally performed for chronic symptoms, including pain, increasing size, intermittent obstruction, and cosmesis. Emergent ventral hernia repair (EMVHR) indications include acute symptoms that are often concerning for strangulation. The study objective included identifying variations in perioperative characteristics as well as clinical and cost outcomes in patients who underwent ELVHR vs. EMVHR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review of ELVHR and EMVHR cases was conducted, exclusive of incidental hernias. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, patient consent was deemed unnecessary by the IRB. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, operative details, clinical outcomes, and hospital costs were included in the analyses. RESULTS: Five-hundred forty-nine patients (453 ELVHR, 96 EMVHR) underwent repair. The EMVHR characteristics included more females (P = 0.009), class 3 obesity (P < 0.001), diabetes (P < 0.001), and bleeding disorder (P = 0.009). The EMVHR indications included incarceration (69%), strangulation (12%), and perforation (2%). Fifty-six percent of EMVHR underwent repair without mesh vs. 3.5% of ELVHR. Six-month wound events and ER visits were similar between groups; hernia recurrence was noted in 4% of ELVHR and 17% of EMVHR (P < 0.001). Pharmacy, ICU, lab, ancillary services, floor, and imaging costs varied significantly between groups. Supply, OR, and total hospital costs were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The EMVHR occurs in a unique patient population with more frequent comorbidities. Incarceration and obstruction are the most common indications for repair. Costs were similar despite more frequent non-mesh repairs and four-fold increase early recurrence rates in EMVHR. Strategies to improve outcomes in EMVHR require further investigation.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4507    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded628    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal